|
We are
always updating our issue pages. Please check back regularly.
Email
us
_______________________
|
|
July 2006 E-Newsletter
We extend our sincere and profuse apologies for
the lack of a newsletter over the past 2 months. When last we produced
a newsletter in April, the Divine Strake test blast had just been
announced. Since that time we have been involved both in the legal
action, coalition building and direct action which has made our
routine activities more challenging to complete. This newsletter
will be a bit longer than normal, covering April through June. We
will release another newsletter covering July in early August.
The BLM comment period closed on May 8, after
receiving approximately
7000 comments. The BLM has indicated that no decision is likely
before
the end of 2006. In a hopeful development, the Bureau of Indian
Affairs has indicated that the process
by which the original contract was approved was irregular, and
that this may impact its final approval. Information compiled by
the Utah Department of Transportation, indicates that the trucks
that would be used by PFS to transport waste from an intermodal
transfer station would be too
big for the road, and the condition of the road is such that
it could not withstand the traffic and weight. At the end of June,
an amendment was added to the Energy and Water Appropriations Bill
that would restrict
the storage of spent fuel to states that already have nuclear
power plants. While this amendment is good news for Utah, the amendment
also includes language that would allow other marginalized and disenfranchised
groups to become prey for the big energy companies and the Department
of Energy. NIRS is actively fighting this amendment. Margene Bullcreek
recently participated in a Chamber of Commerce press conference
in Salt Lake City on April 10. We have a link to an MP3 of her
comments.
Because of the numerous quality assurance issues,
the opening date on Yucca Mountain has been pushed
back to 2020. In response Sen. Pete Domenici R-NM threatened
to introduce
legislation to make changes in the project to ease industry
concerns. On April 4, this legislation was introduced,
and among other provisions, raises the ceiling on the amount of
waste that will be accepted to 132,000
tons , and opens the possibility of reprocessing, or " recycling"
as Senator Domenici calls it. The bill also expedites
a railroad spur, and water
use, both of which are being fought by the State of Nevada,
and formally
designates 147,000 acres of land surrounding Yucca Mountain as under
the control of the Department of Energy. Much of this land is
claimed by the Western Shoshone Nation under the Treaty of Ruby
Valley. Near the end of June, the bill
failed, with Senators saying that it tried to do too much too
fast, and did not address reprocessing. There also appears to be
a timing issue which might make the bills passage in the next session.
If the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership gains traction, reprocessing
may become more politically viable.
Envirocare merged with Scientech and BNG, the
American subsidiary of British Nuclear Fuel in February, forming
Energy Solutions. In June, the acquisition
of Duratek was finalized. Energy Solutions is now pushing for
a piece of the re-processing pie. It has bid for a contract to operate
a pilot plant. but is tight-lipped about where such a plant
may be located. It acquired re-processing expertise with its purchase
of Duratek. It is also expressing the opinion that reprocessing
technology will make
the PFS site obsolete. The merger/acquisition of BNG America
has made it difficult to track the activities of the company, as
press coverage is not always specific about whether BNG means the
American nuclear waste branch, or the portion still owned by British
Nuclear Fuels. In June we learned that a train bound for the Clive,
Utah facility with a load of radioactive material derailed
in Michigan. Disturbingly, neither personnel from the decommissioned
facility, rail personnel or emergency response personnel seemed
to know what the contents were (compare the accounts in the three
articles we posted). The emergency response personnel also seemed
unprepared for dealing with a toxic or radioactive accident,
and didn' t even attempt to check for elevated radiation levels.
We are very concerned at the lack of training, or funding for it,
even as experts point to railways as a favored target of terrorists
and saboteurs.
Since our last newsletter, we have seen the formation
of a 50+
member coalition to oppose the test, a 3-week
postponement, an " indefinite"
postponement, actions in Reno,
St
George, Kanab
and at the Nevada
Test Site to oppose it, dissent noted in the media in
Boise, a petition
drive in St. George and most recently a court
action and withdrawal
of the Finding of No Significant Impact. There continues to
be controversy over whether adequate soil testing has been done.
The government has agreed to public
meetings in Las Vegas and St. George, and perhaps in Salt Lake
City. We urge you to attend these meetings. The government has also
indicated that it would be too risky to conduct the test during
the summer " lightning" months, and that a new date would
be scheduled no
earlier than September. Although Congress discontinued
funding for the " bunker buster" or Robust Nuclear
Earth Penetrator in October of 2005, this test clearly supports
the same objectives. The coalition continues to plan opposing actions,
and we will release blueprints soon for actions you can take locally,
even if you are not in Nevada, Idaho or Utah. Please visit our " Divine
Strake" page for current news and commentary about the
test, as well as information about direct action to oppose it.
The Bush Administration has been taking very dangerous
steps with our security, under secret
directives going back to 2002, the Nuclear
Posture Review of 2002, and now the Global
Nuclear Energy Partnership. An
amendment has been attached to the Defense Appropriations Bill
by Senator Jon Kyl (R-AZ), that would ask the president to determine
whether the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty was still relevant, and
if not to determine what steps are necessary to formally withdraw,
and announce this action to the world. At that point, there would
remain few barriers to renewed nuclear testing. The groundwork
for this position was laid back in 2003. The United States is
talking and acting
tough with Iran about insisting
it cease nuclear enrichment, although that
right is guaranteed to Iran under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation
Treaty. These demands are provoking Iran to threaten
to withdraw from the treaty. At the same time, the United States
proposes an alliance with India, a non-signatory that would allow
the sharing of information explicitly forbidden
under the treaty. Two weapons labs are vying for the honor of
designing the next
generation of nuclear weapons under the name Reliable
Replacement Warhead program, and the rate of plutonium " pit"
(weapon trigger) production at Los Alamos is set to quadruple.
We are seeing the long term legacy of the failure of the Pentagon
to clean up its messes in Hanford
and Savannah
River, Lawrence
Livermore and other
sites, and the costs skyrocketing.
Despite claims by nuclear proponents that the Nuclear Industry has
done a good job of taking care of its waste, the evidence is to
the contrary. And finally, despite numerous security problems
with the firm, the Department of Energy decided to renew
the Nevada Test Site security contract with Wackenhut.
Oyster Creek, Vermont Yankee, A landmark decision
was made in federal court at the beginning of June. A number of
groups including the San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace challenged
the environmental report that did not account for the threat of
terrorism, should spent fuel be stored on site. The court found
that this threat must
be assessed. There have been far-reaching effects to this decision.
Opponents of the re-licensing of Oyster
Creek in New Jersey, and the proposed PFS
dump in Utah both see this decision as a possible support for
their opposition. In May, a federal court dealt another set-back
to states wanting to have control over the shipping of nuclear waste
within their borders. A Washington State law with overwhelming public
support was successfully challenged by the Department of Energy.
The court
found it to violate the Atomic Energy act and the commerce clause
of the US Constitution. Some local governments are starting to protest
that there is no requirement for the NRC to review emergency and
evacuation plants once a plant is licensed. Even if the population
and traffic patters change significantly in the vicinity of a plant,
the plant owner is not required to submit, and the NRC is not required
to review updated plans. Pilgrim
in Massachusetts and Three
Mile Island in Pennsylvania are among the locations where local
governments are protesting. In early May, workers were contaminated
during an accident at Prairie
Island in Wisconsin.
There is an interesting trend on the Reuters wire
service. They have been reporting every instance of a nuclear plant
falling below 100% output, as well as all planned and unplanned
outages. We have been collecting these reports on our Nuclear
Power Plants page. They demonstrate beyond doubt that nuclear
power does not operate 24/7, and that in fact some plants operate
at consistently reduced efficiency, such as the 19
outages experienced by Palo Verde since February 2004, at increased
cost to their ratepayers. At Three Mile Island in late May, a control
room worker failed to notice the presence of an inspector, because
he was too engrossed in his video
game. A damning
report released in late June by the Government Accountability
Office noted problems with the " safety culture" of the
nuclear industry, including the NRC, and calls its oversight of
nuclear power plants " ineffective." There have been
siren
failures, more radioactive waterleaks,
radioactive parts have gone
missing,
In May we provided support for the Western Shoshone
Defense Project Spring Gathering in the form of our large army tents
and water buffalo. One of the tents was also used at the Rock Creek
Gathering in early June.
Shundahai Network, along with the Western Shoshone
Defense Project, was instrumental in getting out
a press release opposing the test blast, and in getting the
ball rolling on forming a coalition that within 6 weeks grew to
50+ members. We issued an
invitation letter to numerous organizations, and handled media
requests nationally and internationally, including Spain and Italy.
The coalition planned and executed 2 events, a major event at the
Nevada Test Site on May 28, and the River of Peace event in Reno
on June 3. Shundahai Network provided logistics at the NTS event
in the form of large gathering tents, communal kitchen, sanitary
and water facilities, event literature and security equipment. There
is an excellent account of this event on
Deanna Taylor' s blog site. Scroll down to the May 30 entry.
The coalition continues to grow. We have now brought Andrew Kishner
into the coalition. He and his partner Karen Tobin organized an
opposition event in
Kanab, and Andrew has created an
excellent web site which is serving as a repository for information
on Divine Strake and the efforts to oppose it. The coalition is
currently working on small local actions and strategy, and a possible
event in October.
We have been tabling at a local street fair on
Friday nights for the past month. We encourage you to conduct local
tabling operations where possible. Let us know if you are interested,
and we can give you pointers on how to get started. Outreach is
particularly important in states that benefit from nuclear power,
to convince residents that dumping this waste on someone else is
immoral.
On our Documents page, we have fact sheets on
Divine Strake and nuclear power, and will be adding more as we convert
our documents to PDFs. Please download these documents and distribute
them locally.
We have a very lean operation in Salt Lake City,
but we do still have to keep the bills paid! Donations of any amount
are always welcome. You can donate securely through PayPal by pressing
the button below our logo.
We will be organizing an event on October 4-10,
including all of the planning and logistical support such an event
requires. We will be creating information packets to help local
organizers protest renewed nuclear testing, as well as the Divine
Strake test. We are continuing to support Margene Bullcreek in her
organizing efforts to help bring elder indigenous women together
to defend their communities against environmental racism. We cannot
do so without your support. Please be generous.
We are always looking for volunteers to help with
outreach tables at community events, flyering, phone banking, and
posting articles on our web site. We are also looking for particularly
motivated volunteers who would like to become subject matter experts,
and contribute in substantial ways to our fact sheets and web content.
Please take a look at out Volunteer
Opportunities page to see our current needs.
Special Thanks
Thanks to Deanna Taylor for setting up the discussion
list for the Divine Strake Coalition, and for her participation
in conference calls, note taking, her blog reports of the event,
and her excellent photos, which have been selected for publication
in Spanish and Italian media in addition to US media. Deanna and
her husband Tom King were an indispensable part of the Stop Divine
Strake event on May 28, with set up, logistics, and the creation
of a camp kitchen under extraordinarily difficult conditions. Thanks
to all of the coalition members, especially those who contributed
to cover the logistical expenses of the May 28 action. Thanks to
Michelle Carfaro and her friend Corey who have been updating the
website and our media list.
Stay tuned…
|